In-depth characterization of long-term humoral and cellular immune responses to COVID-19 m-RNA vaccination in multiple sclerosis patients treated with teriflunomide or alemtuzumab

Background The impact of disease-modifying therapies on the efficacy to mount appropriate immune responses to COVID-19 vaccination in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) is currently under investigation. Objective To characterize long-term humoral and cellular immunity in mRNA-COVID-19 MS vaccinees treated with teriflunomide or alemtuzumab. Methods We prospectively measured SARS-COV-2 IgG, memory B-cells specific for SARS-CoV-2 RBD, and memory T-cells secreting IFN-γ and/or IL-2, in MS patients vaccinated with BNT162b2-COVID-19 vaccine before, 1, 3 and 6 months after the second vaccine dose, and 3-6 months following vaccine booster. Results Patients were either untreated (N=31, 21 females), under treatment with teriflunomide (N=30, 23 females, median treatment duration 3.7 years, range 1.5-7.0 years), or under treatment with alemtuzumab (N=12, 9 females, median time from last dosing 15.9 months, range 1.8-28.7 months). None of the patients had clinical SARS-CoV-2 or immune evidence for prior infection. Spike IgG titers were similar between untreated, teriflunomide and alemtuzumab treated MS patients both at 1 month (median 1320.7, 25-75 IQR 850.9-3152.8 vs. median 901.7, 25-75 IQR 618.5–1495.8, vs. median 1291.9, 25-75 IQR 590.8-2950.9, BAU/ml, respectively), at 3 months (median 1388.8, 25-75 1064.6–2347.6 vs. median 1164.3 25-75 IQR 726.4–1399.6, vs. median 837.2, 25-75 IQR 739.4-1868.5 BAU/ml, respectively), and at 6 months (median 437.0, 25-75 206.1–1161.3 vs. median 494.3, 25-75 IQR 214.6–716.5, vs. median 176.3, 25-75 IQR 72.3–328.8 BAU/ml, respectively) after the second vaccine dose. Specific SARS-CoV-2 memory B cells were detected in 41.9%, 40.0% and 41.7% of subjects at 1 month, in 32.3%, 43.3% and 25% at 3 months, and in 32.3%, 40.0%, 33.3% at 6 months following vaccination in untreated, teriflunomide treated and alemtuzumab treated MS patients, respectively. Specific SARS-CoV-2 memory T cells were found in 48.4%, 46.7% and 41.7 at 1 month, in 41.9%, 56.7% and 41.7% at 3 months, and in 38.7%, 50.0%, and 41.7% at 6 months, of untreated, teriflunomide-treated and alemtuzumab –treated MS patients, respectively. Administration of a third vaccine booster significantly increased both humoral and cellular responses in all patients. Conclusions MS patients treated with teriflunomide or alemtuzumab achieved effective humoral and cellular immune responses up to 6 months following second COVID-19 vaccination. Immune responses were reinforced following the third vaccine booster.

In-depth characterization of long-term humoral and cellular immune responses to COVID-19m-RNA vaccination in multiple sclerosis patients treated with teriflunomide or alemtuzumab.

BACKGROUND: The impact of disease-modifying therapies on the efficacy to mount appropriate immune responses to COVID-19 vaccination in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) is currently under investigation. OBJECTIVE: To characterize long-term humoral and cellular immunity in mRNA-COVID-19 MS vaccinees treated with teriflunomide or alemtuzumab. METHODS: We prospectively measured SARS-COV-2 IgG, memory B-cells specific for SARS-CoV-2 RBD, and memory T-cells secreting IFN-γ and/or IL-2, in MS patients vaccinated with BNT162b2-COVID-19 vaccine before, 1, 3 and 6 months after the second vaccine dose, and 3-6 months following vaccine booster. RESULTS: Patients were either untreated (N = 31, 21 females), under treatment with teriflunomide (N = 30, 23 females, median treatment duration 3.7 years, range 1.5-7.0 years), or under treatment with alemtuzumab (N = 12, 9 females, median time from last dosing 15.9 months, range 1.8-28.7 months). None of the patients had clinical SARS-CoV-2 or immune evidence for prior infection. Spike IgG titers were similar between untreated, teriflunomide and alemtuzumab treated MS patients both at 1 month (median 1320.7, 25-75 IQR 850.9-3152.8 vs. median 901.7, 25-75 IQR 618.5-1495.8, vs. median 1291.9, 25-75 IQR 590.8-2950.9, BAU/ml, respectively), at 3 months (median 1388.8, 25-75 1064.6-2347.6 vs. median 1164.3 25-75 IQR 726.4-1399.6, vs. median 837.2, 25-75 IQR 739.4-1868.5 BAU/ml, respectively), and at 6 months (median 437.0, 25-75 206.1-1161.3 vs. median 494.3, 25-75 IQR 214.6-716.5, vs. median 176.3, 25-75 IQR 72.3-328.8 BAU/ml, respectively) after the second vaccine dose. Specific SARS-CoV-2 memory B cells were detected in 41.9%, 40.0% and 41.7% of subjects at 1 month, in 32.3%, 43.3% and 25% at 3 months, and in 32.3%, 40.0%, 33.3% at 6 months following vaccination in untreated, teriflunomide treated and alemtuzumab treated MS patients, respectively. Specific SARS-CoV-2 memory T cells were found in 48.4%, 46.7% and 41.7 at 1 month, in 41.9%, 56.7% and 41.7% at 3 months, and in 38.7%, 50.0%, and 41.7% at 6 months, of untreated, teriflunomide-treated and alemtuzumab -treated MS patients, respectively. Administration of a third vaccine booster significantly increased both humoral and cellular responses in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: MS patients treated with teriflunomide or alemtuzumab achieved effective humoral and cellular immune responses up to 6 months following second COVID-19 vaccination. Immune responses were reinforced following the third vaccine booster.

Immune response to the third COVID-19 vaccine dose is related to lymphocyte count in multiple sclerosis patients treated with fingolimod.

BACKGROUND: The majority of multiple sclerosis [MS] patients treated with fingolimod fail to develop a protective level of IgG humoral and adaptive cellular immune responses following full BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of the third COVID-19 vaccine dose in vaccine non-responders fingolimod-treated MS patients. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective 3-month, single-center, randomized clinical trial. METHODS: Twenty relapsing MS patients who had been on fingolimod therapy ≥ 12 months and failed to develop humoral IgG immune response to 2-dose Pfizer BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccination were randomized into two groups: fingolimod-continuation group and fingolimod-discontinuation group. Humoral and memory cellular immune responses were assessed within 1 and 3 months following the third Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine dose and compared between the groups. RESULTS: A higher rate of patients in the fingolimod-discontinuation group [n = 8/10] compared to fingolimod-continuation group [n = 2/10] developed positive SARS-COV-2 IgG. Median IgG titer 1 month following the third dose was 202.3 BAU/ml vs. 26.4 BAU/ml, respectively, p = 0.022. The development of IgG humoral response correlated with absolute lymphocyte count. Specific SARS-COV-2 memory B cell and T cell immune responses were not detected in both groups, either at 1 month or 3 months following the third COVID-19 vaccine dose. CONCLUSIONS: Short period of fingolimod treatment discontinuation was associated with the development of humoral protection but not with adaptive cellular immunity.

Humoral immune response in multiple sclerosis patients following PfizerBNT162b2 COVID19 vaccination: Up to 6 months cross-sectional study.

Appropriate immune response following COVID-19 vaccination is important in the context of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs). In a prospective cross-sectional study, we determined SARS-COV-2 IgG response up to 6 months following PfizerBNT162b2 vaccination in 414 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and 89 healthy subjects. Protective response was demonstrated in untreated MS patients (N = 76, 100%), treated with Cladribine (N = 48, 100%), Dimethyl fumarate (N = 35, 100%), Natalizumab (N = 32, 100%), and Teriflunomide (N = 39, 100%), similarly to healthy subjects (N = 89, 97.8%). Response was decreased in Fingolimod (N = 42, 9.5%), Ocrelizumab (N = 114, 22.8%) and Alemtuzumab (N = 22, 86.4%) treated patients. IgG response can help tailor adequate vaccine guidelines for MS patients under various DMTs.

Humoral immune response to COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The National Multiple Sclerosis Society and other expert organizations recommended that all patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) should be vaccinated against COVID-19. However, the effect of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) on the efficacy to mount an appropriate immune response is unknown. We aimed to characterize humoral immunity in mRNA-COVID-19 MS vaccinees treated with high-efficacy DMTs. METHODS: We measured SARS-CoV-2 IgG response using anti-spike protein-based serology (EUROIMMUN) in 125 MS patients vaccinated with BNT162b2-COVID-19 vaccine 1 month after the second dose. Patients were either untreated or under treatment with fingolimod, cladribine, or ocrelizumab. A group of healthy subjects similarly vaccinated served as control. The percent of subjects that developed protective antibodies, the titer, and the time from the last dosing were evaluated. RESULTS: Protective humoral immunity of 97.9%, 100%, 100%, 22.7%, and 3.8%, was observed in COVID-19 vaccinated healthy subjects (N = 47), untreated MS patients (N = 32), and MS patients treated with cladribine (N = 23), ocrelizumab (N = 44), and fingolimod (N = 26), respectively. SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody titer was high in healthy subjects, untreated MS patients, and MS patients under cladribine treatment, within 29.5-55 days after the second vaccine dose. Only 22.7% of patients treated with ocrelizumab developed humoral IgG response irrespective to normal absolute lymphocyte count. Most fingolimod-treated MS patients had very low lymphocyte count and failed to develop SARS-COV-2 antibodies. Age, disease duration, and time from the last dosing did not affect humoral response to COVID-19 vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: Cladribine treatment does not impair humoral response to COVID-19 vaccination. We recommend postponing ocrelizumab treatment in MS patients willing to be vaccinated as a protective humoral response can be expected only in some. We do not recommend vaccinating MS patients treated with fingolimod as a protective humoral response is not expected.

Physical activity behavior in people with multiple sclerosis during the COVID-19 pandemic in Israel: Results of an online survey.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) itself and first-line disease modifying therapies do not increase the risk of contracting COVID-19. However, home isolation is likely to result in a significant decrease in participation in leisure time physical activities and an increase in sedentary behavior. Therefore, using an online cross-sectional survey we examined the impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on physical activity (PA) behavior and fitness level in an Israeli cohort of people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). The survey PA questionnaire included 10 questions. Specifically, participants reported on whether, and to what extent, the pandemic conditions had altered their PA behavior. One hundred and twenty PwMS filled out the online survey, 78 were females with a mean age of 43.0 (S.D.=12.9) years. PA behavior during the pandemic demonstrated that 17.5% who were engaged in PA before the COVID-19 pandemic, ceased PA, 33.3% reduced their PA, 20.0% continued their PA as before, 18.3% increased their PA during the pandemic, and 10.8% did not perform any PA in the past and did not so during the pandemic. As for the patient's self-reported fitness level, 31.7% reported that their fitness level had decreased during the pandemic, 60.0% felt no change, and 8.3% reported an improvement. Our findings serve as a call of action for all professionals involved in MS management to address physical activity behavior in PwMS during the COVID-19 epidemic.

Cytokine prediction of mortality in COVID19 patients.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID19) is a life-threatening infection with uncertain progression and outcome. Assessing the severity of the disease for worsening patients is of importance in making decisions related to supportive mechanical ventilation and aggressive treatments. This was a prospective, non-randomized study that included hospitalized patients diagnosed with COVID19. Pro-inflammatory cytokines were assessed during hospitalization, and we calculated a prediction paradigm for 30-day mortality based on the serum levels of interleukin1ß (IL1ß), interleukin6 (IL6), interleukin8 (IL8), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) measured by next-generation ELISA. Data of 71 COVID19 patients, mean age 62 years, SD13.8, 50 males, 21 females, were analyzed. Twelve (16.9%) patients died within 7-39 days of their first COVID19 positive nasopharyngeal test. Levels of IL6 and TNFα were significantly higher in patients that did not survive. IL6 predicted mortality at the cut-off value of 163.4 pg/ml, with a sensitivity of 91.7% and specificity of 57.6%. Our findings demonstrate that IL6 expression is significant for the prediction of 30-day mortality in hospitalized COVID19 patients and, therefore, may assist in treatment decisions.